Quick-UX. Quick Heuristics for User eXperience.

heuristic Introducing… Quick-UX

There are many procedures, rubrics, methods, analyses and theories with respect to assessing the overall User eXperience of a product. Most User eXperience assessment approaches require a heavy investment of time, analysis and effort.

Often, a quick assessment of User eXperience is more aptly called for. A quick assessment allows for rapid compilation of simple heuristics that can be very handy in providing…

  • a summarized view of a product’s overall User eXperience,
  • directional guidance for a product’s future development, and/or
  • metrics for comparison with other products.

More detailed and extensive heuristics (many with hundreds of variables to evaluate) exist that delve into the finer details that lead to more directly actionable steps, but they are neither cheap in time nor money.

Quick-UX is a method that I have developed and refined over time and frequently utilize when quick assessments are best suited to the task. The method that I describe below is a great way to build a summary description with quantifiable and comparable metrics, representing the understanding of the overall User eXperience of a product.

The Quick-UX evaluates the degree to which a product successfully addresses the following 3 questions:

The elements evaluated in response to each question constitute a minimal representative subset that accurately addresses the question posed while adhering to the goals of Quick-UX.

Evaluating Usability

Whether or not something can actually be used is critical to a product. Quickly evaluating the ease with which the typical consumer can use a product consists of looking at the following variables:

  • Accessibility,
  • Consistency,
  • Recognition (also including Intuitiveness),
  • Navigation (also including site-flow, transitions, and interactions), and
  • Page Load Time.

Each variable here, as well as those making up the other 2 evaluation categories (‘questions’), possess specific rubrics to generate repeatable and quantifiable values (each normalized to be of the range from 0 through 1 or 2) that can consistency be understood and compared to like evaluations. For the Quick-UX, each category can, through the summing-up of each of its values, achieve a maximum category score of 5 (minimum being 0).

Evaluating Usefulness

What good is a product if it isn’t useful? Does the product solve a new problem, or an existing problem? Does it do so in an innovative and creative way? The quick evaluation of Usefulness is constituted by an assessment of these variables:

  • Functional Expectations (expectations are created via marketing, content, branding, etc.; put another way, ‘were the functional expectations of the product, from the perspective of the consumer, achieved?’),
  • Errors (including handling, recovery, and prevention),
  • Product Differentiation (including memorability),
  • Findability (i.e. search engine friendliness), and
  • Credibility.

Evaluating Desirability

The Desirability of the product, its appearance and the feelings it can stir in the user through the methods of presentation, can often be a good proxy for the organic word-of-mouth campaigns and buzz that spring up around it. Desirability taps into the emotions of the product’s users through:

  • Aesthetics (and Minimal Design),
  • Page Layout,
  • Color Scheme (including Contrast), and
  • Typography.

Desirability consists of only 4 variables. Aesthetics, unlike all of the other variables in the Quick-UX, is normalized to a range from 0 through 2, due to its greater impact on the overall desirability of a given product.

Try it. Use it. Tune it.

All of the values, when summed up (max. value of 15), form the UX (User eXperience) Rating for the evaluated product. The higher the rating, the better the product’s overall User eXperience. My favorite use for this evaluation is to quickly compare the User eXperience of multiple products with one another.

As the Internet and online products evolve I update and adapt my approach to quick evaluations. Let me know how the Quick-UX works for you. Tweak it, adjust it to suit your particular goals. Please share your findings.

What sort of quick User eXperience evaluation methods do you use?

More Information

You can read more about alternate User eXperience evaluation heuristics and theories at these websites…

  • Ten Usability Heuristics (link)
  • Stanford Guidelines for Web Credibility (link)
  • The User Experience Wheel (link)
  • Metrics for Heuristics: Quantifying User Experience (part 1 part 2)
  • User Experience Design (link)
  • User Experience Strategy (link)
  • How To Quantify the User Experience (link)
  • Designing Interfaces (link)

Enjoy & Post experiences with Quick-UX and other methodologies.

Jeremy Horn
The Product Guy


105 thoughts on “Quick-UX. Quick Heuristics for User eXperience.

  1. Pingback: Quick-UX. Quick Heuristics for User eXperience. | sanver.info

  2. Pingback: Quick Methodology for User eXperience | Playout Intelligence

  3. Pingback: Can I use it? Evaluating Usability through Quick-UX. « The Product Guy

  4. Pingback: Should I use it? Evaluating Usefulness through Quick-UX. « The Product Guy

  5. Pingback: Do I want to use it? Evaluating Desirability through Quick-UX. « The Product Guy

  6. Pingback: Reveal More « The Product Guy

  7. Pingback: Trust and Credibility - They Go Hand-in-Hand « The Product Guy

  8. Pingback: Quick-MI. Quick Heuristics for Modular Innovation. « The Product Guy

  9. Pingback: Permission and Content. Evaluating Sharability through Quick-MI. « The Product Guy

  10. Pingback: At and Between. Evaluating Interoperability through Quick-MI. « The Product Guy

  11. Pingback: Memorable Utility. Evaluating Convenience through Quick-MI. « The Product Guy

  12. Pingback: To Have and Own. Evaluating Portability through Quick-MI. « The Product Guy

  13. Pingback: On the Aesthetics of Quick-UX « The Product Guy

  14. Pingback: Shining Chrome « The Product Guy

  15. Pingback: Ripening FreshDirect « The Product Guy

  16. Pingback: Overgrown Amazon « The Product Guy

  17. Pingback: On the Recognition of Quick-UX « The Product Guy

  18. Pingback: Familiar pingg « The Product Guy

  19. Pingback: A Spot on myPunchbowl « The Product Guy

  20. Pingback: Mystical Presdo « The Product Guy

  21. Pingback: On the Consistency of Quick-UX « The Product Guy

  22. Pingback: Building better web and mobile applications | Thomas Koeppen Blog

  23. Pingback: Constant Gateway « The Product Guy

  24. Pingback: Inconsistent ActiveState « The Product Guy

  25. Pingback: Southwestern Discomfort « The Product Guy

  26. Pingback: On the Layout of Quick-UX « The Product Guy

  27. Pingback: JohnMees from High to Low « The Product Guy

  28. Pingback: Confusing Domain of GoDaddy « The Product Guy

  29. Pingback: BCC Report Card: Could Do Better « The Product Guy

  30. Pingback: Tunnel’s Vision « The Product Guy

  31. Pingback: c-ville c-onfusing « The Product Guy

  32. Pingback: Stardoll: Lost and Naked « The Product Guy

  33. Pingback: Digitaloop’s Clean Groups « The Product Guy

  34. Pingback: Roll of the Dice.com « The Product Guy

  35. Pingback: The State of Massachusetts SSAA Grouping « The Product Guy

  36. Pingback: Enlaces rápidos (07-04-2009) | dominios, diseño web, ecommerce - Mantis Technology Solutions Blog

  37. Pingback: Quick-UX & Credibility: Do you believe? « The Product Guy

  38. Pingback: Unbelievable Likexo « The Product Guy

  39. Pingback: Skeptical Convert « The Product Guy

  40. Pingback: Unforward ToRSS « The Product Guy

  41. Pingback: IndyBudget’s Deficit « The Product Guy

  42. Are there any Quick-UX software/web app tools that you recommend to make the process easier?
    Tks, @AAinslie


    • I am looking into bringing all of the variables of Quick-UX into a single quick reference guide. Typically, most of the evaluations take a few minutes to perform — and all but 1 or 2 variables lend to any sort of automation. I would be curious to hear what sort of software ideas you may have.


  43. Pingback: Puzzling Pogby « The Product Guy

  44. Pingback: Chart.ly Off Course « The Product Guy

  45. Pingback: Trusting TechCrunch « The Product Guy

  46. Pingback: Credibly Mashable « The Product Guy

  47. Pingback: Convincing GigaOM « The Product Guy

  48. Pingback: UPDATE: Pogby Renewed « The Product Guy

  49. Pingback: What is Credibly Mashable? | Situated Research

  50. Pingback: MakingOf Credibility « The Product Guy

  51. Pingback: ThumbTack Color « The Product Guy

  52. Pingback: Upfront: Etsy « The Product Guy

  53. Pingback: Quick-UX Credibility from Likexo to Etsy « The Product Guy

  54. Pingback: On the Color of Quick-UX « The Product Guy

  55. Pingback: Sea Unfathomably « The Product Guy

  56. Pingback: A Dentist of a Different Color « The Product Guy

  57. Pingback: Higgledy Haven « The Product Guy

  58. Pingback: Clean and Air Cooler « The Product Guy

  59. Pingback: Some quick links, mainly from the Hot St… « IA // COLLAB

  60. Pingback: Google: True Colors Shine Through « The Product Guy

  61. Pingback: The Product Guy: Superfine in 09 « The Product Guy

  62. Pingback: On the Page Load Time of Quick-UX « The Product Guy

  63. Pingback: Twitter’s Crawl « The Product Guy

  64. Pingback: Twine Tied Up in Load Time « The Product Guy

  65. Pingback: Slow Paced Conversation Pieces « The Product Guy

  66. Pingback: Facebook PDQ « The Product Guy

  67. Pingback: Quick-MI and the Redundancy of Interoperability « The Product Guy

  68. Pingback: Permission and Content. Evaluating Sharability through Quick-MI. « The Product Guy

  69. Pingback: At and Between. Evaluating Interoperability through Quick-MI. « The Product Guy

  70. Pingback: Standard Customization. Evaluating Flexibility through Quick-MI. « The Product Guy

  71. Pingback: Automating the Path to a Better User Experience « The Product Guy

  72. Pingback: Evaluating Accessibility: The Quick-UX Way « The Product Guy

  73. Pingback: Well-Rounded Accessibility « The Product Guy

  74. Pingback: Accessibly UseIt « The Product Guy

  75. Pingback: brainmates – product management people » Blog Archive » Quick-MI. Quick Heuristics for Modular Innovation.

  76. Pingback: Nearly, Like an Eboy « The Product Guy

  77. Pingback: Bordering on Mediocrity « The Product Guy

  78. Pingback: Most Moderate of News: Bloomberg & NY1 « The Product Guy

  79. Pingback: brainmates – product management people » Blog Archive » Permission and Content. Evaluating Sharability through Quick-MI

  80. Pingback: CNET & Drudge: On the Cutting Edge of Fair « The Product Guy

  81. Pingback: NBC NY Bringing Fair Accessibility « The Product Guy

  82. Pingback: Less than Grand GoodReads « The Product Guy

  83. Pingback: Quick UX : évaluation rapide de l’expérience utilisateur

  84. Preventing your own blog from pinging itself with pingback would add to this site’s user experience. Putting the comment form before the comments and separating comments from pingbacks would prove you care about the UX you’re talking about. But that might just be my personal, subjective impression. 😉


  85. Pingback: Design UI vs UX ? De quoi s'agit-il ? - Axelles Digital

  86. Attractive portion of content. I just stumbled upon your web site and in accession capital
    to assert that I get in fact loved account your blog posts.
    Any way I will be subscribing on your augment and
    even I achievement you get admission to constantly rapidly.


  87. Searching sites after sites, you will find CMS sites are topping in this sector.
    Apart from that, this Shared web hosting package supports instant set up.

    The looming need for web hosting service has been coupled with the
    ballooning population of service providers.


  88. Hmm is anyone else experiencing problems with the images on this blog loading?

    I’m trying to figure out if its a problem on my end or if it’s the blog.
    Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.


  89. It’s actually a great and helpful piece of info. I’m glad that you just shared this useful info with
    us. Please keep us up to date like this.
    Thank you for sharing.


  90. I don’t even know how I ended up here, but I thought
    this post was great. I don’t know who you are but definitely you’re going to
    a famous blogger if you aren’t already 😉 Cheers!


  91. For those who want a Windows Start-up Manager and an activity which people spend a little amount.
    Moreover, with technology developing at a big fish casino hack rapid pace and that was all
    from my end. Greater bandwidth, greater download/upload speed, you may also collect some
    priceless information on the screen of your hand. By the big fish casino
    hack fourth version of the present times, price of mobile phones.

    This game has to fight boredom. Young people always prefer family photo
    or devotional pictures according to their enemy.


  92. Hey! I just wanted to ask if you ever have any issues
    with hackers? My last blog (wordpress) was hacked and I
    ended up losing a few months of hard work due to
    no back up. Do you have any solutions to stop hackers?


  93. Pretty element of content. I just stumbled upon your site and in accession capital to say that I get in fact enjoyed
    account your blog posts. Anyway I will be subscribing to your feeds
    and even I achievement you get right of entry to persistently rapidly.


  94. This is not to say there was no science involved with ninja weapons.
    Ever since the days that Bruce Lee flashed this elegant weapon on the big screen, the nunchaku
    has achieved celebrity status among its practitioners and developed a loyal following among
    non-martial arts students. The Complete Book of Karate Weapons,
    which is still in print after 30 years.


  95. I think this is among the most important information for me.
    And i’m glad reading your article. But should remark on some
    general things, The website style is perfect, the articles is really great :
    D. Good job, cheers


  96. The characteristics accessible with this type of service can be very extensive.

    The most common question in you should ask yourself is how to choose a web host.
    The c – Panel will allow the website administrator to gain full control
    of their website simply and logically.


  97. Ninja nunchaku need to be the proper length for the user. We are not trying to make you
    get frightened about the society; instead, we just need you
    to be aware that you too are exposed to the
    treats in the public. Weapons can also be divided into bladed and


  98. Good way of explaining, and pleasant post to obtain information concerning
    my presentation topic, which i am going to convey in university.


Comments are closed.