user experience

Quick-UX. Quick Heuristics for User eXperience.

heuristic Introducing… Quick-UX

There are many procedures, rubrics, methods, analyses and theories with respect to assessing the overall User eXperience of a product. Most User eXperience assessment approaches require a heavy investment of time, analysis and effort.

Often, a quick assessment of User eXperience is more aptly called for. A quick assessment allows for rapid compilation of simple heuristics that can be very handy in providing…

  • a summarized view of a product’s overall User eXperience,
  • directional guidance for a product’s future development, and/or
  • metrics for comparison with other products.

More detailed and extensive heuristics (many with hundreds of variables to evaluate) exist that delve into the finer details that lead to more directly actionable steps, but they are neither cheap in time nor money.

Quick-UX is a method that I have developed and refined over time and frequently utilize when quick assessments are best suited to the task. The method that I describe below is a great way to build a summary description with quantifiable and comparable metrics, representing the understanding of the overall User eXperience of a product.

The Quick-UX evaluates the degree to which a product successfully addresses the following 3 questions:

The elements evaluated in response to each question constitute a minimal representative subset that accurately addresses the question posed while adhering to the goals of Quick-UX.

Evaluating Usability

Whether or not something can actually be used is critical to a product. Quickly evaluating the ease with which the typical consumer can use a product consists of looking at the following variables:

  • Accessibility,
  • Consistency,
  • Recognition (also including Intuitiveness),
  • Navigation (also including site-flow, transitions, and interactions), and
  • Page Load Time.

Each variable here, as well as those making up the other 2 evaluation categories (‘questions’), possess specific rubrics to generate repeatable and quantifiable values (each normalized to be of the range from 0 through 1 or 2) that can consistency be understood and compared to like evaluations. For the Quick-UX, each category can, through the summing-up of each of its values, achieve a maximum category score of 5 (minimum being 0).

Evaluating Usefulness

What good is a product if it isn’t useful? Does the product solve a new problem, or an existing problem? Does it do so in an innovative and creative way? The quick evaluation of Usefulness is constituted by an assessment of these variables:

  • Functional Expectations (expectations are created via marketing, content, branding, etc.; put another way, ‘were the functional expectations of the product, from the perspective of the consumer, achieved?’),
  • Errors (including handling, recovery, and prevention),
  • Product Differentiation (including memorability),
  • Findability (i.e. search engine friendliness), and
  • Credibility.

Evaluating Desirability

The Desirability of the product, its appearance and the feelings it can stir in the user through the methods of presentation, can often be a good proxy for the organic word-of-mouth campaigns and buzz that spring up around it. Desirability taps into the emotions of the product’s users through:

  • Aesthetics (and Minimal Design),
  • Page Layout,
  • Color Scheme (including Contrast), and
  • Typography.

Desirability consists of only 4 variables. Aesthetics, unlike all of the other variables in the Quick-UX, is normalized to a range from 0 through 2, due to its greater impact on the overall desirability of a given product.

Try it. Use it. Tune it.

All of the values, when summed up (max. value of 15), form the UX (User eXperience) Rating for the evaluated product. The higher the rating, the better the product’s overall User eXperience. My favorite use for this evaluation is to quickly compare the User eXperience of multiple products with one another.

As the Internet and online products evolve I update and adapt my approach to quick evaluations. Let me know how the Quick-UX works for you. Tweak it, adjust it to suit your particular goals. Please share your findings.

What sort of quick User eXperience evaluation methods do you use?

More Information

You can read more about alternate User eXperience evaluation heuristics and theories at these websites…

  • Ten Usability Heuristics (link)
  • Stanford Guidelines for Web Credibility (link)
  • The User Experience Wheel (link)
  • Metrics for Heuristics: Quantifying User Experience (part 1 part 2)
  • User Experience Design (link)
  • User Experience Strategy (link)
  • How To Quantify the User Experience (link)
  • Designing Interfaces (link)

Enjoy & Post experiences with Quick-UX and other methodologies.

Jeremy Horn
The Product Guy


  1. Are there any Quick-UX software/web app tools that you recommend to make the process easier?
    Tks, @AAinslie


    1. I am looking into bringing all of the variables of Quick-UX into a single quick reference guide. Typically, most of the evaluations take a few minutes to perform — and all but 1 or 2 variables lend to any sort of automation. I would be curious to hear what sort of software ideas you may have.


  2. Preventing your own blog from pinging itself with pingback would add to this site’s user experience. Putting the comment form before the comments and separating comments from pingbacks would prove you care about the UX you’re talking about. But that might just be my personal, subjective impression. 😉


  3. Attractive portion of content. I just stumbled upon your web site and in accession capital
    to assert that I get in fact loved account your blog posts.
    Any way I will be subscribing on your augment and
    even I achievement you get admission to constantly rapidly.


  4. Searching sites after sites, you will find CMS sites are topping in this sector.
    Apart from that, this Shared web hosting package supports instant set up.

    The looming need for web hosting service has been coupled with the
    ballooning population of service providers.


  5. Hmm is anyone else experiencing problems with the images on this blog loading?

    I’m trying to figure out if its a problem on my end or if it’s the blog.
    Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.


  6. It’s actually a great and helpful piece of info. I’m glad that you just shared this useful info with
    us. Please keep us up to date like this.
    Thank you for sharing.


  7. I don’t even know how I ended up here, but I thought
    this post was great. I don’t know who you are but definitely you’re going to
    a famous blogger if you aren’t already 😉 Cheers!


  8. For those who want a Windows Start-up Manager and an activity which people spend a little amount.
    Moreover, with technology developing at a big fish casino hack rapid pace and that was all
    from my end. Greater bandwidth, greater download/upload speed, you may also collect some
    priceless information on the screen of your hand. By the big fish casino
    hack fourth version of the present times, price of mobile phones.

    This game has to fight boredom. Young people always prefer family photo
    or devotional pictures according to their enemy.


  9. Hey! I just wanted to ask if you ever have any issues
    with hackers? My last blog (wordpress) was hacked and I
    ended up losing a few months of hard work due to
    no back up. Do you have any solutions to stop hackers?


  10. Pretty element of content. I just stumbled upon your site and in accession capital to say that I get in fact enjoyed
    account your blog posts. Anyway I will be subscribing to your feeds
    and even I achievement you get right of entry to persistently rapidly.


  11. This is not to say there was no science involved with ninja weapons.
    Ever since the days that Bruce Lee flashed this elegant weapon on the big screen, the nunchaku
    has achieved celebrity status among its practitioners and developed a loyal following among
    non-martial arts students. The Complete Book of Karate Weapons,
    which is still in print after 30 years.


  12. I think this is among the most important information for me.
    And i’m glad reading your article. But should remark on some
    general things, The website style is perfect, the articles is really great :
    D. Good job, cheers


  13. The characteristics accessible with this type of service can be very extensive.

    The most common question in you should ask yourself is how to choose a web host.
    The c – Panel will allow the website administrator to gain full control
    of their website simply and logically.


  14. Ninja nunchaku need to be the proper length for the user. We are not trying to make you
    get frightened about the society; instead, we just need you
    to be aware that you too are exposed to the
    treats in the public. Weapons can also be divided into bladed and


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: