Permission and Content. Evaluating Sharability through Quick-MI.

clip_image001The first of the 5 components of Quick-MI, which I will be discussing in greater depth, is Sharability. Sharability is the measure of how much and to what degree information can be shared.

For relationships to work, between products, just like with people, sharing must be present. And to share, to receive, there must be both Permission as well as the more fundamental characteristic of having something to share, having Content.

In abiding with the overarching goals of both Quick-UX and Quick-MI (quick assessment for summary, directional guidance, and quantitative comparison) the variables constituting the minimal representative subset for Sharability are…

  • Content
  • Permission

Each variable (e.g. Content, Permission) is assigned a value that can be compared and combined. When all the categories’ values are combined they form the Modular Innovation Index of a product.

Content

Without any Content that can be shared, the ability to share breaks down pretty quickly. The Content that one can share with another can be many things, from that which is personally generated (directly or indirectly), to Content available to a specific group, to part or all of an individual’s settings / customizations.

Further examples of Content can be seen as metadata, text, images, settings, stories, conversations – a blog post, comments within a forum, avatar image, and identification of one’s favorite topics.

Determining the value for the Content variable is done through briefly surveying the product, followed by the assignment of a value…

  • 0 if there is no Content that exists that can be shared, or
  • 1 if some of the Content is found to be sharable, or
  • 2 if all of the Content, personal, group, global, including all user settings, are sharable.

For example, an individual’s Twitter Content can be shared with all or just a few friends, while the majority of one’s settings and preferences remain out of sight to all but the Twitter account’s owner; achieving a Content variable value of 1.

Permission

Some products allow sharing of Content with only registered users. Others allow sharing within parameters based on the type of user or method of access.

The Permission variable value is broadly determined as the sum of affirmative confirmations to the following conditions (with the starting value of 0)…

  • If the Content can be shared with everyone, add 1, and
  • If the Content can be optionally shared with specific groups (e.g. clubs, types of members), add 1, and
  • If the Content can be optionally shared with specific individuals, add 1.

One such exemplary product provides for very fine controls by the account holder of their permission settings, controlling what Content is public and can be seen by all, what content is limited to specific user Lists and Groups, and what content is meant for the individually targeted eyes of a select friend; achieving Facebook a Permission variable value of 3.

Quickly Shared

Quick-MI is all about understanding and measuring the relationships formed and supported between online products, especially those pioneering the next generation of web products via Modular Innovation.

Sharability, as the summation of both variables of Content and Permission, when combined with the other categories of Quick-MI

… present a sound, representative, quantification of a product’s ability to foster relationships both within and without — yielding an oft missed, yet critical, perspective into the success and sustainability of a product online.

Enjoy, Discuss & Tweet!

Jeremy Horn
The Product Guy

PS Try it out, tweak it, learn more about Modular Innovation and share you experiences.

About these ads

Quick-MI. Quick Heuristics for Modular Innovation.

clip_image001

(Re)Introducing… Quick-MI
Modular Innovation (MI) is all about relationships, be they between people or products online. In looking at how these relationships are established, maintained, enhanced, and expanded, one can achieve greater insight into the underlying forces shaping Modular Innovation, quantifying the degree by which a product is participating within, as well as evolving towards greater degrees of, Modular Innovation.

Today, Modular Innovation is a prevailing trend that can be described as products and platforms consisting of or facilitating…

  • Relationships (people-people, products-products, people-products)
  • Control of Experience (from creation to storage to interaction)
  • Ownership of Content (personal content from comments to friend lists and more)

Time & Space, UX & MI

Often the initial and continuing success of an online product is solitarily framed in terms of User eXperience (UX). To understand Modular Innovation’s role in a product’s online success is to understand how this trend of relationships (aka Modular Innovation) relates to User eXperience, and can, itself, be quantified for comparison and analysis against other products.

One way to think about the interplay between User eXperience (quantified via Quick-UX) and Modular Innovation (quantified via Quick-MI) is to draw, metaphorically, from physics, namely Space and Time. If User eXperience represents Space, and the variables and characteristics of a product’s UX represent it’s shape and form within that Space, then Modular Innovation aptly would be imputed Time. Like Time, you do not necessarily see or directly interact with the forces (quantifiable categories) of Modular Innovation, but Time, Modular Innovation, is very important if you are, the product is, going to move forward, have an enjoyable experience, and persist into the future.

Quick-MI

Quick-MI is the simplification of the quantification of the Modular Innovations, the products and platforms, which make up the trend of Modular Innovation. The method described below is a great way to build a summary description with quantifiable and comparable metrics, representing the level of Modular Innovation present within a product.

More detailed and extensive heuristics are, of course, possible (I frequently evaluate along many more variables in my studies of Modular Innovation). Quick-MI allows you to dive into a product and quickly extract valuable, representative data points.

The Quick-MI evaluates the degree to which a product successfully addresses the following 5 categories:

Once quantified, the values associated with each of the categories are summed to represent the Modular Innovation Index of a given item (product, platform, etc.).

The characteristics evaluated within each category constitute a minimal representative subset that accurately evaluates the Modular Innovation Index while adhering to the goals of a method that are (1) quantifiable, (2) comparable, and (3) quick.

Some of the questions that are answered within the categories of the Quick-MI are…

Within Sharability

  • Can functionality and content of a product be shared?
  • With whom can it be shared?
  • How much can be shared?

Within Flexibility

  • Which aspects, and to what extent, can I customize the Sharing, Portability, Interoperability, and Convenient parts of the product?
  • Do the methods and formats adhere to commonly accepted standards?

Within Interoperability

  • Can the product interact with external products (and vice versa)?
  • Are there legal restrictions placed on content or other interactions?
  • Does the available interoperability facilitate redundancy and stability?

Within Portability

  • What content, if any, do I own?
  • Can I move my content to other products?
  • Can I control my content without any UX penalties?

Within Convenience

  • From where, and at what times, can I access the product and the content?
  • With what degree of ease can I shift between venues and times?

Not Without UX

Modular Innovation should not be seen as an alternative, isolated, judge of the overall success or failure of a given product, but rather as a central, complementary, influential part of the equation. Together, MI and UX shape the course of the evolution and, ultimately, the eventual success or failure of a product.

Modular Innovation is Relationships

The more relationships, the stronger the relationships, in turn, the stronger and broader can be a product’s acceptance, support, and success. These relationships comprise Modular Innovation. They are the trend. They exist within the products that are themselves Modular Innovations, albeit to varying degrees, as measured via Quick-MI. They are the characteristic elements (described, at a high-level by the Quick-MI categories) that propel a product forward, or a lack thereof, that stalls or otherwise hinders its progress.

The role and presence of relationships within and between people, products and platforms are ever increasing in importance and influence. They represent the next substantial evolution of the internet, beyond simply the data, but, now, to all the spaces in between. This can be seen in the sub-trends, with respect to Modular Innovation as a whole, like those of semantic web and data portability.

These relationships can be quantified, analyzed, built and expanded upon. Once quantified, products are better understood and clearer courses are able to be set for improvement and solidification of the elements within products directly relevant to Modular Innovation, and subsequently relevant to sustained success. And the current methods of Quick-MI, itself evolving and adapting, can be used in observing, from industry trend to individual product, the impact and the role of Modular Innovation on products and related trends.

Enjoy, Discuss & Tweet!

Jeremy Horn
The Product Guy

PS Try it out, tweak it, learn more about Modular Innovation and share you experiences.

Echo’s Sound: Reverberations in Modular Innovation

00_echo-logo As the next decade prepares to unfold, so too will the challenges faced by both the products and peoples of the Internet. Foremost to many are the challenges of …

            • continuing to craft one’s own unique experience and interaction with the online world, while
            • enhancing and being enhanced by the ever growing web of relationships, connections between person and person, person and product, product and product.

Empowerment & Control, Relationships & Connections

image Such challenges know many forms. Perhaps one significantly familiar, especially to those of you reading these very words, centers around the exchange of content and opinions —

  • in the manner you want,
  • when you want,
  • by the means you want.

Whether you are the publisher of the original content, or the opinionated commenter, you most often are left with a mere sliver of a limited vantage point of the current state of discourse and its connectivity to everything and everyone else. Some products, some services, today, are striving to bridge these gaps, make everyone more connected, make knowledge more connected, and further empower everyone through the expanding continuum of means to generate and follow conversations and their relationships. These products are services are known as, and part of, Modular Innovation. And, Echo is one such Modular Innovation.

02_echo-homepage

Echo. Echo.

Echo is a commenting module for websites and blogs that allows for bi-directional communication, aggregating comments from outside the web product within which it is installed and distributing those locally made comments to other web products, such as Twitter, Facebook, etc.

Echo’s goal is to create a more connected, real-time, interactive Internet through the

  1. capturing of the echoes, offline continuing conversations based on a web product’s content (blog post, web page, etc.), and bring these echoes back to the local web product, and
  2. facilitating the continuation of the reverberations created by the web product’s content through the optional distribution of new, locally made comments back to the external, social spheres, e.g. Twitter, Facebook, etc.

Sound Pressure & Noise

There are definitely many challenges facing the evolution of Echo and its founder’s perception of it within the larger ecosystem of Modular Innovation. Most directly, its challenges can be seen coming from Echo’s two chief competitors: Disqus and IntenseDebate.

Intense Debate Disqus
03_intensedebate 04_disqus

Where Echo, best displays its strengths are in Integration and User Experience. Where an Echo conversation is seen to be ongoing within a web product, it can be seen, in motion, in real-time, fully interweaving conversations both local and remote into a single, cohesive whole. The user experience is more inline with a distributed conversation, continuous across a variety of platforms, and centralized. When content within a web product is augmented with Echo, the resulting discourse is treated as a whole, no matter its source; local comments are not separated from remote ‘reactions,’ as occurs in Disqus.

05_echo-integrated

That said, Disqus currently has the edge over the competitors, most especially due to a …

  • Robust API (invaluable in accelerating innovation, Interoperability, Portability, and Sharability)
  • Price of Free (most especially contrasted with Echo which recently removed its Free Core Option, in place of a paid subscription model for all tiers)
  • Large Community of Publishers and Commenters (as a result, more people are more likely to have a Disqus account, more people are likely to configure their Disqus account to extend the propagation of the conversations)

Propagation

Like some of its competitors, as well as other players in Modular Innovation, Echo has borne witness to the growing desire for greater Modular Innovation, stronger relational ties between people and products online. As recently as this past December, in addition to further enhancing the Echo experience with …

  • image Whirlpools: Turn long conversation threads and similar comments into neat clusters of activity.
  • Split Stream: Split the Echo stream between comments and other ’social reactions’ with total control over the visual layout.
  • Social Likes: A lightweight way for readers to participate by endorsing each other’s comments. User faces and names are displayed for everyone to see.
  • Pause: An intuitive and subtle feature that simply queues any new items from appearing in the real-time stream while the user is hovering over Echo.

Pasted from <http://blog.js-kit.com/2009/12/01/echo-innovation-accelerated/>

… Echo also announced the continuing mainstream adoption of the product, along with the underlying principles of Modular Innovation, through the receipt of new customers: CBS/CNET, Discovery News, Dow Jones Local Media Group, Hearst Digital News, etc.

Ranges & Levels

07_chris-saad Chris Saad, VP Product Strategy & Community at Echo and co-founder of the DataPortability Project, has a perspective on Echo and the Internet, at large, strongly founded in the core principles of Modular Innovation.

"Where we once built websites – destinations that attracted ‘traffic’ from which we monetized ‘eye balls’ – that had loose connections in the forms of links, we now build widgets; lightweight pieces of functionality that connect countless sites and services using rich, deep and meaningful pieces of functionality.  Like individual neurons, "sites" must now maximize their connections to outside data sources and applications in response to external stimuli or risk being pruned themselves. "

from <http://synapticweb.pbworks.com/>

"More profoundly, though, the connections between those pieces will be just as important as the pieces themselves. The connections will be interoperable and create spontaneous meaningful interactions."

from <http://synapticweb.pbworks.com/>

The Modular Innovation trends seen within many of the cutting edge, next generation products, services, and platforms are often described via the instructive categories of…

 

So, with what aspects of Modular Innovation is Echo strongest?

image Most prominent to the successes of Echo are the characteristics: Interoperability and Sharability.

Central to the value offering of Echo is Interoperability – the means by which information is shared and disparate products can continually exchange information. The list of products that Echo shares Connectivity with is large, and continues to grow, pulling in information from various web products…

Facebook, Twitter, Google Reader, Digg, StumbleUpon, FriendFeed, Delicious

… and also permitting the pushing out of users’ new comments to most of the same products.

Another feature, also shared with Disqus, is Redundancy of the user generated content, also referred to as UGC. Redundancy of functionality and content is provided by these products…

  • providing for both local and remote storage of UGC,
  • providing remote functionality in place of the local, built-in equivalent.

This level of Redundancy allows for the administrators of products that make use of Echo to run old and new commenting systems in parallel, in turn, allowing for the uninterrupted continuation of the dialog should the remote system cease to exist or the primary party’s product priorities change.

image Also at the heart of Echo is the Sharability of most of its content (excluding user Settings). When users post new comments, they can optionally share with one or more of the supported web products (listed above).

Reflection

Echo has a lot of things going for it, including a great experience. However, and in addition to the deficits already identified, and now re-emphasized as lacking…

  • a robust programmer API, and
  • a free tier in the pricing model…

… Echo would be well served by…

  • Increasing Connectivity
    • 10_linked-in If an article is posted to another source (with matching URL to the source), then pull in those comments too; and allow for an administrator to control (enable, disable, etc.) the detected and pulled in channels per content item, as well as site wide. For example…
      • If a news article is posted to LinkedIn, with a URL matching that of Echo-enabled local content, then when comments are made on the LinkedIn article, they should be pulled in to the local, original content.
    • When replying to a comment that originated from an external product, the reply should be posted BOTH locally and as a reply on the external product, thereby maintaining the Connectivity and flow of the conversation.
    • Allow for the local content creator to specify hashtags, or for hashtags to be extrapolated from the comments or content, to be able to selectively broaden the expansion of a conversation — not requiring a URL to always be the unique identifier of externally occurring content.
  • Improving Usability
    • Not all of the functionality is immediately clear, especially to a new user, when faced with the email-feeling new comment form. Individuals who implement Echo would benefit from being able to configure a more flexible user experience, forcing the display of some or all of the available ‘from’ and ‘to’ options.
    • Also, while the email paradigm may make sense to the more technically savvy, especially those knowledgeable of Echo’s core features, to the average user, it may be presenting too confusing a twist

    11_from-to-focus

    • Encourage more robust, complex conversations and sub-dialogues by…
      • Extracting supplemental comments, replies, from RT’s, and
      • Enabling unlimited levels of threaded conversation.
  • Improving Platform Integration
    • Allow administrators to, per page/post, disable and/or limit commenting. For example, if a WordPress blog post or page is set to ‘disable comments’ or ‘disable new comments’ then Echo, too, should not permit comments.

Echo is a very exciting product, with tough competition, whose presence is being heard loud and clear throughout the Internet, with reverberations influencing all flavors of the coming generation of web products, Modular Innovations.

As more products (from Twitter and Twine to Google and Microsoft) adopt the core principles of Modular Innovation, the relationships we all have with one another and the products and services we use online will dramatically evolve and forever change.

And, as these changes are occurring and, in the meantime…

check out Echo (and/or its competition), and

come back to share your experiences.

Who do you think will win the commenting system battle?

Is there room for more than one winner?

What do you think should be next in commenting? in Modular Innovation?

Enjoy!

Jeremy Horn
The Product Guy

Add to Social Bookmarks: Stumbleupon Del.ico.us Furl Reddit Google Add to Mixx!

Permission and Content. Evaluating Sharability through Quick-MI.

community_users The first of the 5 components of Quick-MI, that I will be discussing in greater depth, is Sharability. Sharability is the measure of how much and to what degree information can be shared.

For relationships to work, between products, just like with people, sharing must be present. And to share, to receive, there must be both Permission as well as the more fundamental characteristic, of having something to share.

In abiding with the overarching goals of both Quick-UX and Quick-MI (quick assessment for summary, directional guidance, and quantitative comparison) the variables constituting the minimal representative subset for Sharability are…

  • Content
  • Permission

Each variable and category (e.g. Sharability) is assigned a value that can be compared and combined. When all the categories’ values are combined they form the Modular Innovation Index of a product.

Content

Without any Content that can be shared, the ability to share breaks down pretty quickly. The Content that one can share with another can be many things, from that which is personally generated, to Content available to a specific group, to part or all of an individual’s settings / customizations.

Further examples of Content can be seen as metadata, text, images, settings, stories, conversations – a blog post, comments within a forum, avatar image, and identification of one’s favorite topics.

Determining the value for the Content variable is done through briefly surveying the product, followed by the assignment of a value…

  • 0 if there is no Content that exists that can be shared, or
  • 1 if some of the Content is found to be sharable, or
  • 2 if all of the Content, personal, group, global, including all user settings, are sharable.

Permission

Some products allow sharing of Content with only registered users. Others allow sharing within parameters based on the type of user or method of access.

The Permission variable value is broadly determined as the sum of affirmative confirmations to the following conditions (with the starting value of 0)…

  • If the Content can be shared with everyone, add 1, and
  • If the Content can be optionally shared with specific groups (e.g. clubs, types of members), add 1, and
  • If the Content can be optionally shared with specific individuals, add 1.

Quickly Shared

Quick-MI is all about understanding and measuring the relationships formed and supported between online products, especially those pioneering the next generation of web products via Modular Innovation. Relationships have to start somewhere. And, at their start, and an important cornerstone to Quick-MI, is sharing and, therefore, the product’s Sharability score.

Sharability, as the summation of both variables of Content and Permission, when combined with the other categories of Quick-MI

… present a sound, representative, quantification of a product’s ability to foster relationships both within and without — yielding an oft missed, yet critical, perspective into the success and sustainability of a product online.

Enjoy & Discuss!

Jeremy Horn
The Product Guy

Add to Social Bookmarks: Stumbleupon Del.ico.us Furl Reddit Magnolia Google Add to Mixx!

Quick-MI. Quick Heuristics for Modular Innovation.

kllckety

Introducing… Quick-MI
Modular Innovation (MI) is all about relationships, be they between people or products online. In looking at how these relationships are established, maintained, enhanced, and expanded, one can achieve greater insight into the underlying forces shaping Modular Innovation, quantifying the degree by which a product is participating within, as well as evolving towards greater degrees of, Modular Innovation.

Today, Modular Innovation is a prevailing trend that can be described as products and platforms consisting of or facilitating…

  • Relationships (people-people, products-products, people-products)
  • Control of Experience (from creation to storage to interaction)
  • Ownership of Content (personal content from comments to friend lists and more)

Time & Space, UX & MI

Often the initial and continuing success of an online product is solitarily framed in terms of User eXperience (UX). To understand Modular Innovation’s role in a product’s online success is to understand how this trend of relationships (aka Modular Innovation) relates to User eXperience, and can, itself, be quantified for comparison and analysis against other products.

One way to think about the interplay between User eXperience (quantified via Quick-UX) and Modular Innovation (quantified via Quick-MI) is to draw, metaphorically, from physics, namely Space and Time. If User eXperience represents Space, and the variables and characteristics of a product’s UX represent it’s shape and form within that Space, then Modular Innovation aptly would be imputed Time. Like Time, you do not necessarily see or directly interact with the forces (quantifiable categories) of Modular Innovation, but Time is very important if you are, the product is, going to move forward, into the future.

Quick-MI

Quick-MI is the simplification of the quantification of the Modular Innovations, the products and platforms, that make up the trend of Modular Innovation. The method I describe below is a great way to build a summary description with quantifiable and comparable metrics, representing the level of Modular Innovation present within a product.

More detailed and extensive heuristics are, of course, possible (I frequently evaluate along many more variables in my studies of Modular Innovation). Quick-MI allows you to dive into a product and quickly extract valuable, representative data points.

The Quick-MI evaluates the degree to which a product successfully addresses the following 5 categories:

Once quantified, the values associated with each of the categories are summed to represent the Modular Innovation Index of a given item (product, platform, etc.).

The characteristics evaluated within each category constitute a minimal representative subset that accurately evaluates the Modular Innovation Index while adhering to the goals of a method that are (1) quantifiable, (2) comparable, and (3) quick.

Some of the questions that are answered within the categories of the Quick-MI are…

Within Sharability

  • Can functionality and content of a product be shared?
  • With whom can I share?
  • How much can be shared?

Within Flexibility

  • What aspects, and to what extent, can I customize the Sharing, Portability, Interoperability, and Convenient parts of the product?
  • Do the methods and formats adhere to commonly accepted standards?

Within Interoperability

  • Can the product interact with external products (and vice versa)?
  • Are there legal restrictions placed on content or other interactions?
  • Does the available interoperability facilitate redundancy and stability?

Within Portability

  • What content, if any, do I own?
  • Can I take it with me?
  • Can I control my content without any UX penalties?

Within Convenience

  • From where, and at what times, can I access the product and the content?
  • With what degree of ease can I shift between venues and times?

Not Without UX

Modular Innovation should not be seen as an alternative, isolated, judge of the overall success or failure of a given product, but rather as a central, complementary, influential part of the equation. Together, MI and UX shape the course of evolution and the eventual success or failure of a product.

Modular Innovation is Relationships

The more relationships, the stronger the relationships, in turn, the stronger and broader can be a product’s acceptance, support, and success. These relationships comprise Modular Innovation. They are the trend. They exist within the products that are themselves Modular Innovations, albeit to varying degrees, as measured via Quick-MI. They are the characteristic elements (described, at a high-level by the Quick-MI categories) that propel a product forward (or a lack thereof, stalls or otherwise hinders its progress).

The role and presence of relationships within and between people, products and platforms are ever increasing in importance and influence. They represent the next substantial evolution of the internet, beyond simply the data, but, now, to all the spaces in between. They can be seen in the sub-trends, or minor trends, with respect to Modular Innovation as a whole, like those of semantic web and data portability.

These relationships can be quantified, analyzed, built and expanded upon. Once quantified, products are better understood, and clearer courses are able to be set for improvement and solidification of the elements within products directly relevant to Modular Innovation, directly (yet, not exclusively) relevant to sustained success. And the current methods of Quick-MI, itself evolving and adapting, can be used in observing, from industry trend to individual product, the impact and the role of Modular Innovation on products and related trends.

Enjoy, Discuss & Share!

Jeremy Horn
The Product Guy

PS Try it out, tweak it, learn more about Modular Innovation and share you experiences.

Add to Social Bookmarks: Stumbleupon Del.ico.us Furl Reddit Magnolia Google Add to Mixx!