<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick-UX &amp; Credibility: Do you believe?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tpgblog.com/2009/04/21/quickux-usefulness-credibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tpgblog.com/2009/04/21/quickux-usefulness-credibility/</link>
	<description>Discussion, advice, and reviews regarding online products, the people behind them and the trends they represent, from Modular Innovation and Product Management to User Experience and Quick-UX.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:56:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quick-UX Credibility from Likexo to Etsy &#171; The Product Guy</title>
		<link>http://tpgblog.com/2009/04/21/quickux-usefulness-credibility/#comment-2124</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quick-UX Credibility from Likexo to Etsy &#171; The Product Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 22:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theproductguy.wordpress.com/?p=1769#comment-2124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] August 3, 2009 &#8212; Jeremy Horn   As a brief postscript to the series exploring Quick-UX and Credibility I would like to share a back of napkin sketch that I made at the beginning of the process that [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] August 3, 2009 &#8212; Jeremy Horn   As a brief postscript to the series exploring Quick-UX and Credibility I would like to share a back of napkin sketch that I made at the beginning of the process that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThumbTack Color &#171; The Product Guy</title>
		<link>http://tpgblog.com/2009/04/21/quickux-usefulness-credibility/#comment-2048</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ThumbTack Color &#171; The Product Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theproductguy.wordpress.com/?p=1769#comment-2048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Establishing and maintaining Credibility is the removal, or minimization of concerns arising from these types of questions. Many elements (design, accuracy, usability, timeliness, advertising, etc.) contribute to the positive, or negative, perception of overall product Credibility, but for Quick-UX&#8217;s evaluation we assess only the most elemental. For a refresher of the Quick-UX Credibility Rubric visit: Quick-UX &amp; Credibility: Do you believe? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Establishing and maintaining Credibility is the removal, or minimization of concerns arising from these types of questions. Many elements (design, accuracy, usability, timeliness, advertising, etc.) contribute to the positive, or negative, perception of overall product Credibility, but for Quick-UX&#8217;s evaluation we assess only the most elemental. For a refresher of the Quick-UX Credibility Rubric visit: Quick-UX &amp; Credibility: Do you believe? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MakingOf Credibility &#171; The Product Guy</title>
		<link>http://tpgblog.com/2009/04/21/quickux-usefulness-credibility/#comment-1959</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MakingOf Credibility &#171; The Product Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theproductguy.wordpress.com/?p=1769#comment-1959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Establishing and maintaining Credibility is the removal, or minimization of concerns arising from these types of questions. Many elements (design, accuracy, usability, timeliness, advertising, etc.) contribute to the positive, or negative, perception of overall product Credibility, but for Quick-UX&#8217;s evaluation we assess only the most elemental. For a refresher of the Quick-UX Credibility Rubric visit: Quick-UX &amp; Credibility: Do you believe? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Establishing and maintaining Credibility is the removal, or minimization of concerns arising from these types of questions. Many elements (design, accuracy, usability, timeliness, advertising, etc.) contribute to the positive, or negative, perception of overall product Credibility, but for Quick-UX&#8217;s evaluation we assess only the most elemental. For a refresher of the Quick-UX Credibility Rubric visit: Quick-UX &amp; Credibility: Do you believe? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UPDATE: Refreshed Likexo &#171; The Product Guy</title>
		<link>http://tpgblog.com/2009/04/21/quickux-usefulness-credibility/#comment-1915</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[UPDATE: Refreshed Likexo &#171; The Product Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 14:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theproductguy.wordpress.com/?p=1769#comment-1915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] (UX). In answering the question of Usefulness, &quot;Should I use it?&quot; the sub-category of Credibility is one in the frequent discussion of cautious engagement, especially in the ever increasing, in [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (UX). In answering the question of Usefulness, &quot;Should I use it?&quot; the sub-category of Credibility is one in the frequent discussion of cautious engagement, especially in the ever increasing, in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What is Credibly Mashable? &#124; Situated Research</title>
		<link>http://tpgblog.com/2009/04/21/quickux-usefulness-credibility/#comment-1881</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[What is Credibly Mashable? &#124; Situated Research]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theproductguy.wordpress.com/?p=1769#comment-1881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Establishing and maintaining Credibility is the removal, or minimization of concerns arising from these types of questions. Many elements (design, accuracy, usability, timeliness, advertising, etc.) contribute to the positive, or negative, perception of overall product Credibility, but for Quick-UX’s evaluation we assess only the most elemental. For a refresher of the Quick-UX CredibilityRubric visit: Quick-UX &amp; Credibility: Do you believe? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Establishing and maintaining Credibility is the removal, or minimization of concerns arising from these types of questions. Many elements (design, accuracy, usability, timeliness, advertising, etc.) contribute to the positive, or negative, perception of overall product Credibility, but for Quick-UX’s evaluation we assess only the most elemental. For a refresher of the Quick-UX CredibilityRubric visit: Quick-UX &amp; Credibility: Do you believe? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UPDATE: Pogby Renewed &#171; The Product Guy</title>
		<link>http://tpgblog.com/2009/04/21/quickux-usefulness-credibility/#comment-1857</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[UPDATE: Pogby Renewed &#171; The Product Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theproductguy.wordpress.com/?p=1769#comment-1857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] (UX). In answering the question of Usefulness, &quot;Should I use it?&quot; the sub-category of Credibility is one in the frequent discussion of cautious engagement, especially in the ever increasing, in [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (UX). In answering the question of Usefulness, &quot;Should I use it?&quot; the sub-category of Credibility is one in the frequent discussion of cautious engagement, especially in the ever increasing, in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Convincing GigaOM &#171; The Product Guy</title>
		<link>http://tpgblog.com/2009/04/21/quickux-usefulness-credibility/#comment-1822</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Convincing GigaOM &#171; The Product Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theproductguy.wordpress.com/?p=1769#comment-1822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Establishing and maintaining Credibility is the removal, or minimization of concerns arising from these types of questions. Many elements (design, accuracy, usability, timeliness, advertising, etc.) contribute to the positive, or negative, perception of overall product Credibility, but for Quick-UX&#8217;s evaluation we assess only the most elemental. For a refresher of the Quick-UX Credibility Rubric visit: Quick-UX &amp; Credibility: Do you believe? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Establishing and maintaining Credibility is the removal, or minimization of concerns arising from these types of questions. Many elements (design, accuracy, usability, timeliness, advertising, etc.) contribute to the positive, or negative, perception of overall product Credibility, but for Quick-UX&#8217;s evaluation we assess only the most elemental. For a refresher of the Quick-UX Credibility Rubric visit: Quick-UX &amp; Credibility: Do you believe? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Credibly Mashable &#171; The Product Guy</title>
		<link>http://tpgblog.com/2009/04/21/quickux-usefulness-credibility/#comment-1774</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Credibly Mashable &#171; The Product Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theproductguy.wordpress.com/?p=1769#comment-1774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Establishing and maintaining Credibility is the removal, or minimization of concerns arising from these types of questions. Many elements (design, accuracy, usability, timeliness, advertising, etc.) contribute to the positive, or negative, perception of overall product Credibility, but for Quick-UX&#8217;s evaluation we assess only the most elemental. For a refresher of the Quick-UX Credibility Rubric visit: Quick-UX &amp; Credibility: Do you believe? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Establishing and maintaining Credibility is the removal, or minimization of concerns arising from these types of questions. Many elements (design, accuracy, usability, timeliness, advertising, etc.) contribute to the positive, or negative, perception of overall product Credibility, but for Quick-UX&#8217;s evaluation we assess only the most elemental. For a refresher of the Quick-UX Credibility Rubric visit: Quick-UX &amp; Credibility: Do you believe? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trusting TechCrunch &#171; The Product Guy</title>
		<link>http://tpgblog.com/2009/04/21/quickux-usefulness-credibility/#comment-1723</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trusting TechCrunch &#171; The Product Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 20:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theproductguy.wordpress.com/?p=1769#comment-1723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Establishing and maintaining Credibility is the removal, or minimization of concerns arising from these types of questions. Many elements (design, accuracy, usability, timeliness, advertising, etc.) contribute to the positive, or negative, perception of overall product Credibility, but for Quick-UX&#8217;s evaluation we assess only the most elemental. For a refresher of the Quick-UX Credibility Rubric visit: Quick-UX &amp; Credibility: Do you believe? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Establishing and maintaining Credibility is the removal, or minimization of concerns arising from these types of questions. Many elements (design, accuracy, usability, timeliness, advertising, etc.) contribute to the positive, or negative, perception of overall product Credibility, but for Quick-UX&#8217;s evaluation we assess only the most elemental. For a refresher of the Quick-UX Credibility Rubric visit: Quick-UX &amp; Credibility: Do you believe? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chart.ly Off Course &#171; The Product Guy</title>
		<link>http://tpgblog.com/2009/04/21/quickux-usefulness-credibility/#comment-1691</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chart.ly Off Course &#171; The Product Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 12:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theproductguy.wordpress.com/?p=1769#comment-1691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Establishing and maintaining Credibility is the removal, or minimization of concerns arising from these types of questions. Many elements (design, accuracy, usability, timeliness, advertising, etc.) contribute to the positive, or negative, perception of overall product Credibility, but for Quick-UX&#8217;s evaluation we assess only the most elemental. For a refresher of the Quick-UX Credibility Rubric visit: Quick-UX &amp; Credibility: Do you believe? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Establishing and maintaining Credibility is the removal, or minimization of concerns arising from these types of questions. Many elements (design, accuracy, usability, timeliness, advertising, etc.) contribute to the positive, or negative, perception of overall product Credibility, but for Quick-UX&#8217;s evaluation we assess only the most elemental. For a refresher of the Quick-UX Credibility Rubric visit: Quick-UX &amp; Credibility: Do you believe? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

